Clogging (Commenting on Blogs)

Well, when I come across a clearly false assertion that has not been refuted by others, I am often compelled to post a direct reply to that specific assertion. Just because a blog is clearly right-wing; many others, called lurkers, may read the posts without comment. Some may be young, or just unknowing. As such, I believe it is important to respond to false assertions, especially on high-traffic sites that purport to have influence.
I have a few personal rules-of-thumb that have served me well. (And when I have ignored my own rules-of-thumb, I have often witnessed the consequences.)
The truth always matters.
Winning an argument is not the goal.
Listen to others.
Respect others.
Admit error.
Admit fallibility.
Retract or clarify as required.
Find common ground where possible.
Be sure of your facts; research *before* posting.
Support your assertions with appropriate cites.
Stay on-topic.
Ad hominem is always off-topic.
Ignore off-topic comments.
Post only when you have something new to add to the discussion.

Labels: Blogging
5 Comments:
A few threads I have posted to on Polipundit.
Often, the longest discussions concern the Intelligent Design movement. Of course, Intelligent Design is not a scientific endeavor, but a political movement. That's why the only significant discussion of Intelligent Design is in political forums.
Evolution Defined.
Hi Twerp/Twerpette!
Polipundit just self-destructed in a frenzy of back-biting. Ironically, it was over an issue of guest-bloggers disagreeing with the host about guest-workers — the immigrant issue.
Well, Polipundit has reconstructed itself — somewhat. They have replaced reasonable bloggers with people who consider accusations of "liar" and "idiot" to be arguments.
They parody themselves so well that they will have little influence outside their own echo-chamber. It doesn't seem necessary to post there.
Clogging
http://www.clogon.com/the-7-most-watched-clogging-dance-videos-on-youtube/
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home